George Bluestone’s Novels into Film

George Bruceton's novel George Bruceton's novel "Movie Fiction" in the first chapter has begun to point out the fundamental difference between written images and visual images. The Bluestone is trying to form a movie / movie from movies and television literature is in the chapter "Movie fiction and limits of limitations". Films and literature seem to share a lot, but in the process of turning a piece into a movie, he pointed out that important changes can not be avoided.

George Bluestone discusses his time, spiritual time and his performance in fiction and movies in his book "Novels into Film". He uses the distinction created by Henri Bergson to distinguish between the two periods in the stories of novels and movies. The time (or time) of the time series includes the duration of the reading, the time required by the narrator to associate the story, and the duration of the narrative event. Calculate hours, minutes, days, weeks, and years in chronological order. Bluestone believes that the definition of psychological time has two important features; the psychological time is "Expanding consciousness or compressing and appearing constantly" (emphasized, Bluestone 48-49) . Psychological time represents the period we think our experience will last. You can "enlarge" one minute and keep feeling time, and you can "compact" one hour in our head for one hour.

George Bluestone's chronological definition of time can be applied directly to text and makes it a very suitable method for time analysis of new morphological features. Time series analysis determines the time required for a reader to read a book, the time required for a narrator to tell a story, and the period during which a story is actually deployed. Psychological time is not clearly stated. The main conclusion of Bluestone is that both novels and movies can not express the flow of psychological time. This raises the question of what is the attempt to express the flow of time in literature.

In his classic study novel adaptation movie (1954), George Blyston thought that "Novels have transformed because of assimilating prose, letters, memoirs, history, religious beliefs, declarations" and supplementing it Yes 16: Folklore, theater, epics, and romance. The movie itself, in particular, "transforms because it assimilates photos, music, dialogue, dancing" - people can add - art that causes literature and history, paintings, visible colors, audible sounds, and embarrassment like sleep. But the movie does more than that. A movie is different from literature and history because you have to move two or more types of media and move several tracks. As was pointed out by German-American film theorist and perceptual psychologist Rudolf Arnheim (1904-2007) in 1938, this movie is a complex art work.