Hungarian Marxist literary critic George Lukács (pronounced GAY-org LOU-cotch) is one of the major theorists of socialist realism and is the only literary style recognized in the Soviet Union. As the only good way to write, to defend realism, especially ideological realism, Rukachi had to do a literary movement to replace realism against Western realism (James Joyce, William Faulkner) Writer, Robert Mussier etc are waiting. This article is his attempt to completely separate the two, which promotes realism.
In adopting this view, we agree that the advantages of the novel of the 19th century arise from the identity with the mainstream ideology, and that it creates a world that is inconsistent with these ideologies. From this point of view, we recommend that failures of Dickens 'novels be considered often - he failed to establish a novel of the 19th century on writers' works such as Stendhal, George Eliot, Tolstoy . I am working on practicing realism. - Not only because of characteristics and pure incompetence. Rather, they are the result of humanitarian value that leads to aversion to the world where it is impossible to achieve these values.
Which social value / dominant ideology will it strengthen / destroy it? Georg Lukacs considers "Western Marxistism" as an alternative to "Humanist" to replace Stalinist theory - the most liberal Marxist. His materialization theory examines the nature of all relations through relationships between transaction objects. The class is the result of economic oppression. The literature itself is the product of the work and it is a recognizable work by itself - the criticism of Marxist shows "The text is shown as a product that can not be regarded as a condition of its production, it must be silent" ( Marxist critique Marxist critique is influenced by Marx 's Marxist theory including: Terry Eagleton - Criticism and Thought
A famous person in the history of Marxist literary criticism is George · Rukaach. He was the first major Marxist critic. He thinks that literature should not be marginalized, that is to say alienated audiences by capitalism. Modernism keeps the audience away from social and economic reality through its individualism, the flow of consciousness, and so on. He clearly disagrees with new literary movements such as Expressionism, Surrealism, Symbolism, and other realistic movements such as Naturalism and Impressionism. As Lukács believes, these movements actually support the collapse of the objectivity of the realism of the 19th century. Therefore, artistic works should reflect the reality of social class and should show the basic model of social economic law which dominates society. It fulfills the cause of the Communist Party through realistic literature and art. (Leitch 1030 - 1033)