Essay sample library > Genocide Apology

Genocide Apology

2023-04-15 06:50:08

Politics of apology - Do you think that you are advancing, forgiving, forgotten, or sorry for any massacre? "In the history of a country, people must confidently accept their future, there are times when we have to reconcile with their past" (Luke, 2008: 167 pages). The concept of apology is often associated with compensation in research of genocide (Lofstrom, 2011: p. 94). The scholar asks whether apologies or confessions are adequate response after the genocide.

So far, we run genocide, ignore the group that we admit in most cases, then apologize for inaction. Even though we have national interest, it is time for action to not take place. If genocide is currently occurring in Sudan, the US should stop excuses and postpone our action policy. We should not become 'world policeman', this is not our purpose. In order to suppress genocide and promote worldwide cooperation and peace, we should work under the UN flag. This seems all ideal, but it is certain that this is a very realistic view. The United States signed the UN values ​​This is a reality. The UN's support for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a reality. So, America does the same. If the United States chooses to be a wealthy member of the United Nations, they should stick to their values ​​and policies.

Excerpt: In this article, we will explain how the draft of 'Convention on Prevention and Punishment of Genocide' and 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights' overlap. This duplication helps explain why these documents do not correspond directly to cultural massacres. The drafters of the Genocide Treaty removed the bans and punishments of cultural genocide from their documents. It is clear that the Communist Party and the Arab delegation support the cultural genocide clause of the Treaty of Genocide and the provisions of minorities in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Western representatives have understood the link between Communism and the Arab delegation's ongoing cultural genocide and physical massacre. Therefore, they voted to remove the cultural massacre prohibition in the Convention, and they promised to support similar measures in the "World Declaration".