Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings by Julian Savulescu

The development of technology is closely related to the conquest of the human Earth, but as the use of technology gets too far, the problem still exists. Advances in medicine have improved the life expectancy of individuals and improved the quality of life for individuals. Medicine and biology steadily change humans by utilizing advanced genetic changes. This technology raises the problem of how to use this new technology.

Especially when the released population is autonomous, genetic modification has attracted attention. In the word of Julian Savulescu, director of Oxford Uehiro Practice Ethics Center, "People are worried that genes may enter the real world and not know if they become infected by mosquitoes and start to move, but I do not know how these mosquitoes look like, but Savulescu thinks that this concern is "the science of today can be reasonably resolved".

Several people have signed up to this new world. Philosophers such as John Harris of University of Manchester and Julian Salulescu of Oxford believe that Savulescu is responsible for manipulating the genetic code of future children who call it "birth benefit". The term "neglect of parents" has been extended to "ignoring genes" in this field. In other words, if you do not use genetic engineering or cognitive enhancement to improve your child, this indicates abuse. Others, such as David Correia teaching American studies at New Mexico University, came up with the result of blindness. There, wealthy people use genetic engineering to transform power from social realm into persistent code of the genome itself.

Bennett Foddy, DPhil, Harold T. Shapiro Ph.D. in Bioethics at Princeton University Human Values ​​Research Center, and Prof. Dr. Julian Savulescu, Professor and Uehiro of Practice Ethics Professor at Oxford University, in June 2007 on Health Ethics Principles The section entitled "Ethics Improve Ethics: Ethics of Drugs and Gene Stimulators" I wrote the following article: Since the use of stimulants is illegal, stress is not dependent on safety, but performance enhancers Is not detected. Performance enhancers are manufactured or purchased in the black market and are managed in a secret, unmanaged manner without monitoring the athletes' health status. Allowing the use of safety enhancers is more stressful for exercise because less stress on the application of unsafe improver by athletes is reduced and the pressure to develop new safety enhancers is greater , Existing improvements will be more effective at safe doses