Genesis of Suicide Terrorism

Contemporary suicide terrorists from the Middle East are considered crazy cowards who are passionate about prosperity in terms of public poverty and ignorance. According to recent research, they have no obvious psychopathology, have been shown to be as educated as economically rich as the surrounding population. The first line of defense is to learn how to minimize the acceptance of most people in recruitment organizations and allow communities blocked by suicide attackers to block attacks.

The third dimension of the multi-causal framework for analyzing the causes of suicide terrorism is the level of the environment that takes social and cultural factors and conditions into consideration that affect the causes of suicide terrorism. Socio-cultural factors include politics, economics, society, history, cultural ideology, religious background and so on. Of course, some of the above factors have a greater impact on individuals and groups than other factors. "For example, the religious background is seen as a more important factor and explains why some Islamic organizations are using suicide attacks more frequently than in the case of LTTE (dominant nationalist organization) In addition, regardless of whether it is a long-term conflict or a country or group fighting for national independence, the political context of the country or region will affect the use of suicide attacks.

As a means to support the causes of suicide terrorism and to create points of discussion to raise awareness about its existence, introduce the above multi-causal framework. This framework recognizes methods that can be analyzed at three different levels (individuals, organizations, environments). This framework does not promote discussion on all possible causes of suicide terrorism, but it allows for elaboration of key thematic areas. At the individual level, the main point of "revenge and humiliation" is consistent in most cases as a clue to the cause analysis of suicide terrorism. At the organization level, goals and motivations are noticeable. The main difference between these two areas is that the factor responsible for suicide terror at the individual level is a personal factor and contributing factors at the organization level are tactical and strategic.

The first dimension of the multi-causal framework for studying suicide terror is an individual level analysis aimed at determining the individual motives of all possible participants involved in suicide attacks. Moghadam (2005) assumes that this level of personal evaluation is important. This is mainly because unwelcome emotions that can lead to terrorism often lead to the use of terrorist violence. He further believes that the source of reliance on political violence by some people will respond others by nonviolent means. "Therefore, there must be personal decision making elements including the origin of terrorism (Friedland 1992: 88, quoted in Moghadam in 2005)"