General Question How large should government be?

Note: These are criticisms of labor theory of value as descriptive theory (we are trying to explain ways to actually put value in attribution). Do not criticize the theory of labor's labor as a normative theory (trying to explain how we attribute values ​​to things)

On the contrary, this discussion usually implies that "what is the state of nature before social contract", "how much freedom should be exchanged as authority", "how the structure of the government should look" It is doubtful. "What is the impact of the war?", "How much force do the head of state and other government departments possess, and how much freedom do people have?" In addition, "human nature is not allowed nature "And" Does the natural state tell us what stage of our society is evolutionary? "

First of all, the question is about the size and scope of the government, in particular the role of the federal government in people's lives. Will the large central government endanger the broader social welfare concerns and concerns about the national security during the war with terrorism and endanger freedom and responsibility? How much country debt is compatible with free society? Secondly, long-standing debate about American exceptionism. In the present situation, it includes the role of the United States as the world's only superpower: we are still a moral example of the world? Do we have a responsibility to use American power and influence to lead the world to freedom and autonomy?