Gender differences during processing of the Stroop task.

There is some evidence to the contrary (for example, Sarmany, 1977), there is a claim that "there is no gender difference in Stroop interference" (MacLeod, 1991, p. 203). To address this difference, this study examined the nature of the gender in relation to other variables. Six men and eight women were tested using response speeds and errors as dependencies. Independent variables are sex, perceptual input (stroop) task, consistency of stimulus, manual response output, and test block. Contrary to McLeod, their error rate is not much different, but males are always 46 milliseconds slower than women. The response output interacts with the gender, the stroke task, and the trial block. Consistent stimulation is faster than inconsistent stimulation. Differences may be due to higher language of women and better motor skills, and larger male spatial abilities.

In the context of the Stroop Color Word task, we examine the sex of processing speed. In general, a strike interference effect was observed. Word reading is faster than color naming. Specifying the color of incompatible color words instead of the X series will make the response time much slower. Compared to men, female participants react more quickly when giving names to incompatible color words. In contrast, women and male participants did the same thing with reading words and color naming tasks. These findings are not enough to confirm the gender difference of the stroop interference effect

This study was designed to determine the effect of sex on the color word subtask of the Stroop Test, which requires participants to specify an ink color for unadjusted color words. This subject has been studied for more than 80 years but never has been analyzed systematically about the impact on gender. Use the meta-analysis program to identify the systematic gender difference of the Stroop Color-Word subtask. A total of 126 effects amount was confirmed from 60 studies. The results found a significant female superiority overall, but its effect was very small, d = 0.12. The benefits of all ages and cultures are important. The results show that the feminine advantage is small for the Stroop task, but the strength of this difference depends greatly on the difference in measurement between the different versions of the task.

In this study, we evaluated gender performance differences between men and women in Kuwait in the Stroop test (Stroop, 1935). Participants were 504 university students, 122 men and 382 women (age M = 21: 0, SD = 2.7 years old). Previous studies have shown that women basically show discriminatory performance with men (shorter incubation period) with word cards, color cards and stroop test color cards. As a result, when intercepting three test cards in particular, color cards could read faster for Kuwaiti women than men (interaction effect). Sex difference was seen in the color card test and the color card test, but there was hardly any gender difference in the word card test. The results confirm the sex of the stroop color and interference.