Gender and Nature in Science

Science is idealized as a completely neutral and objective field that provides fair answers to questions from society. However, science can not exempt the influence of the background. This means that the background of who is conducting scientific research and scientific research is affecting science. Investigation of a metaphor that links women to nature clearly shows that the emergence of new science, especially science, "prove" women's inferiority and promote women's conquest and nature exploitation.

The characteristic of modern criticism is the imperialistic form of tool rationality and super rational technology. For example, CAROLYN MERCHANT "The New Ecological Revolution: Nature, Gender and Science in New England" (1989) (Earlier New England settlers enjoyed a relationship before nature-related ecological perception and capitalism. Attitude of the tool); James Scott seems to be in a state how how some programs to improve human condition will fail 11-24 (1998) (19 as an example of "very modern" aesthetics and management Describe the "scientific forestry" of the century))

In this article I will explain the politics (as practice) and the gender of political science (as field). It examines the characteristics of gender classification of most institutions in the modern world and explains how sex shapes people, thinks, and understands the world. Then, this article has studied politics and gender scholarship, identifying the changes that occurred in political science and political science over the past 100 years. Finally, I will present my understanding of the evolution of gender and political fields and some of the remaining tasks.

Feminists have many different interests and perspectives on science. Scientific tools are important materials for understanding the nature, influence and perspective of changes in the form of suppression by gender, and in this spirit, feminists actively use and promote scientific research projects I will. At the same time, the feminist believes that science is the cause of gender inequality and is also the cause of gender inequality: the science system has a long tradition of excluding women from practitioners. Speaking more broadly, women and sexual / minor concerns are often left behind as scientific research subjects, or by copying gender normative stereotypes, and by closing this circle the scientific authority We often make feminism Social role and institutional rationalization