In my letter, Vonnegut said the above sympathy for "losers" had an effect on "Harrison Bergeron". If the misinterpretation of this part is valid, the sympathy of the implied author is Harrison Bergeron and its indignation is to try to prevent the privilege of Diana Moon Glampers. But Vonnegut thinks that the role he agrees is Gramps, not Bergeron. He first established a position as a writer with both a conscious intention and an unconscious intention, and he was also a reader. Not only did he write conscious and unconscious content, he also wrote the actual content of the actual text.
Harrison Bergeron of Kurt Vonnegut. Full text can be obtained from here. Vonnegut has become a cultural stimulus of the cramped irony of the government to force the future to be equal in all respects, quoted in discussions of public policy, and has appeared in the debates of the Supreme Court. Sentinel of Arthur C. Clark. Clark made a sentinel in 1948. The core idea of this story is that the alien is to leave a tool of advanced technology for human discovery, he will create for the next fifteen years and eventually will create it in 2001. : Space roaming. The full text of The Sentinel is here.
It is easy to see that Harrison Bergeron has done powerful political and social criticism. But what exactly does Vonnegut criticize? The general view of Vonnegut in the irony of Harrison Bergeron shows that this irony is for the Soviet Union. This view comes from historical background (Harrison Bergeron was published during the Cold War era, when anti-communist propaganda was in America). In the 1960s, the United States came into contact with Russia during the Cold War and recently struggled in the McCarthy era when Communists were accused by art, literature, and political community and on the black list. The future American Harrison Belerger society supports the idea that wealth and power should be distributed equally and class hierarchy should not exist, according to the principle of communism.