From Nature to Society

From nature to society In 1690, John Rock laid the foundation for his civil society philosophy in his second government paper. In France after 65 years, Jean Jacques Rousseau began a similar initiative to disintegrate social contracts to an extent that is easy to explain. For their own purposes, the two political philosophers used the same term most notably the "state of nature". It is clear that Rousseau borrowed many lock concepts and cited rocks many times in his argument about the origin of inequality.

People are free from the framework provided by the enforcement of natural law and social law, not from nature, not from society and its law. When they are known, they will make their wills relatively free. But they also decided their own limits, that is, limits to achieve human self-configuration goals. Free will is not self-will, but arbitrariness. Spinoza thought in his time that freedom should be understood as a need for freedom rather than arbitrariness. Will is the most active part of human consciousness. It will show you the desire to act, choose the direction of action, decide to act in some way and achieve a goal. In the causal relationship wave, humans are not driftwoods. He is very fine. Freedom is indicated by intentional activities

For Karl Marx, humanity reflects their society. It is a product of relationships between human consciousness (their psychology), material world, and society. These three things have created our nature in society, but we also have the basic species nature. Our basic nature or the nature of the species is more important for Marx than our personal character. If they have family conflicts, they are likely to participate in gangs as they are driven out of their families at a young age, and the gang provides a way that is completely independent of their parents' age. Family involvement is also a major aspect of the risk that women will join the group. The extent of the involvement of the women's family affects the development of her life