From Myth to Multiculturalism

Nieto and Bode (2008) stated that myths of the first generation European immigrants who came to America during the immigration examination period from 1880 to 1915 are their academic successes. But the truth is that most of the immigrants did not graduate from high school and did not go to high school (Rothstein, 2004 Nieto & Bode, quoted in 2008), most immigrants did not pass high school ("education" nd). For example, only 17% of men living in Providence, Rhode Island in 1715 and 9% of second generation Italian students advanced to high school and only 33% of graduates graduated (Foner & Alba, 2006).

In 1995, they tried to collaborate on a book entitled "Diversified Myth: Multiculturalism" and "Intolerance Politics" at Stanford University. In their introduction they wrote about multiculturalism: "Multiculturalism makes Stanford a different than the great university rather than the third world country, corrupts the theorists and dissatisfies his subordinates "Ultra political legitimacy in the 1990s In the mid term he entered the legal field when Liberalist Vigil joined Robert Curry to sue Stanford University and restricted student freedom of speech It was. Proceedings arise from questions surrounding speech codes that restrict students from insulting on the basis of only six different categories.

The major change to multiculturalism has always been the subject of European scholars. Several scholars like Bagehot (2007) said that the myth of "multiculturalism of diverse death" is exaggerated by European media and major political actors, so if you only mention multiculturalism, It causes insensitivity reaction. In the "Economist" column, Bagehot (2007) pointed out that "multiculturalism", when applied to British politicians and their policies, is almost as despised as "socialism" and "new conservatism" It is claimed that. Even beyond their perception of many other things, the main political stimulus in their belief that multiculturalism is a somewhat simple idea, time should pass, or should not appear at all It is unified. (Item 2)

Kincheloe and Steinberg explain the confusion between the terms "multiculturalism" and "multicultural education" in the "exchange of multiculturalism" (1997). In order to clarify the conversation about the topic, they developed a taxonomy of the various ways in which the term was used. The authors alert their readers that they openly advocate important multicultural stances that readers should consider when considering their classification to their readers. In their classification, Kincheloe and Steinberg classify multiculturalism into five categories: conservative multiculturalism, liberal multiculturalism, pluralistic multiculturalism, leftististic essentialism, multiculturalism, and criticism Multiculturalism. These categories are named on the beliefs of the two largest political schools (liberalism and conservatism) in American society and reflect the principles of their respective political thought.