freud - is civilisation problematic

Interpretation of FREUD 's mental error on psychological order exists in existing problems. The question I chose was "Do you explain whether psychoanalytic interpretation of Floyd's psychology explains whether civilization was a problem?" The question basically asks Freud about human psychology (or mind) and whether it is a harmonious society. Because the belief is contradictory, the existence of civilization is essentially a dilemma. I try to answer this question by using the hypothesis about Freud's psychology.

In "civilization and its dissatisfaction", Sigmund Freud combines technology and cutting, and the tools created by humans replace his organs and limbs. Ide said. "He is really spectacular when he wears all the auxiliary organs, but these organs have not grown over him, and from time to time they still bring a lot of problems to him." Although it is a mountain of dust, what is his view of contemporary writers? Did contemporary writers abandon something to leave room for new writing? "Follow Freud's prosthetic technology logic to create the latest hardware and software to create the latest hardware and software Why is it cut out of the author?" Tom McCarthy won the Booker Award ( Booker Prize). Author of the finalist - C. He answered: "Caution".

In 'civilization and its dissatisfaction', Freud thought that enemies of civilization would be established by historical events and resolved the lack of expected benefits brought about by advances in modern civilization technology. Despite having to survive, it is repressive. Because I believe that this is more restrictive than most people can deal with and can not produce at least some neurotic symptoms, more than a "spiritual spirit" or a psychosis than "madness" The shape still produces unhappy mind condition and body condition. For Freud, civilization is an instinctive opponent and initiator of oppression.