Through Flair's "Educational Banking Concept" we will see the impact of this concept on students and also confirm the impact of different concepts and problem configurations. With the concept of "banking transactions", students can become knowledge gatherings, not learning at creative pace. Understanding how to teach education in the classroom using Communism is parallel to Flair's "banking" concept. We can see that both of these ideas are similar and harmful to human thought. "Banking" constitutes a threat of creative growth and power, but Marxism applies Marx's idea to Communist learning, but it creates a threat that can never be learned.
The concept of a bank is "a gift from people who think there are things to know about unknown people" (Freire 213). The goal of the concept of "bank" is to save as much information as possible to students. This leads to a memory disruption, not a real understanding and frustration of creative thinking. They can not think by themselves. As Marx wrote, he explains that society is like this, as there are two types of learning, "Banking" and Problem Synthesis. There are superordinate class and subordinate class. They are all fighting economic and political power, and the main way for the upper class to maintain power is through their beliefs and values. They are allowed to think. Because of the prestige and way of thinking of the upper classes, the men think that they are their subordinates. Like Flair's "banking" concept, education is a way to make a student disappointed, as students accept all teacher's knowledge, like the prevailing class in Marx ideology.
There are still several reasons why Flair's educational philosophy disadvantages Marx. This is because most obedient people eventually fight back to gain their own ideas. Therefore, the concept of "bank" itself is flawed. When Marx talked about subordinates that they had to live in the upper class, he says for a while that suppresses deserving something more worthy than they accepted I forgot to mention.
Paul Freire's banking philosophy His essay "The Bank" In the concept of education Paul Freire condemns the current belief about education and believes his own, new and radical thinking that he believes should be done I strongly support it How do I move? From his writing it is obvious that he wants to convey a very strong emotion in this article. First, after giving a very brief explanation of "current" education, he pointed out that "education is suffering from stories".
I decided to compare the articles of Paulo Freire and Richard Rodriguez. Paul Freire's article "The Concept of Banking in Education" states that education is mainly unilateral and repressive. He thinks that this is bad for the future of society as a whole and explains in detail how the concept of "bank" shakes in his article. - Concept and Desire of Educational Bank The achievement of education is a theme that can be examined in various ways. Richard Rodriguez 's Essay "Achieving Desire" and Paul Freire' s Article "Concept of 'Bank Education' A thorough study of education in the banking industry of education. After reading the two papers, one can make some assumptions. Various educational methods, and the method of Professor Rodriguez
As a solution to the concept of banking work, Freire proposed an educational approach to ask questions. The "problem raising" approach is contrary to the bank's educational philosophy. Flare said, "Banking education anesthesia and disturbs creativity, but the problem always reveals the reality of education" (266). Essentially, Freire said banking concepts interfere with human creativity, the problem emphasizes spontaneity and constitutes an education that prepares individuals to face reality. He believes that the way to question can promote individual creativity and thus encourage this learning process in this way. The concept of banking in education is only one way communication, but problem education emphasizes two-way communication between teacher and student. Teachers need not only educate but also learn from students.