Logic arises from a feasibility study, often accompanied by research as evidence and a reasonable form. In determining the value of a logical argument, it is necessary to evaluate the relationship between the conceptual idea with the proposed object effectively. But in addition to ourselves, everyone can not think that they thought of themselves as they existed in their only consciousness. In order to express such thoughts, we need to use a language tool to develop ideas and ideas into words to share with the community.
Gottlope Frege (1848-2925) for his contribution to mathematics, logic and language and famous philosophy. In the first section, why languages, mathematicians philosophy and why Fregeing for him should be important explains the following. At the same time, these considerations may help to explain some of the general motivation behind the development of another branch of the 20th century language philosophy as a philosophy. Language analysis and the second transaction, Frege's landscape into the development and use forms of such languages is the philosophy of logic motivation. Section 3 explains the meaning of the early change algebra, not only the distinction between his famous meaning and significance, but the motivation for this shift. This section also explains the difficulties encountered when trying to search right Academic English translation of Fregeke Semantic terminology.
But why the incredible language, why Frege think it is? These two issues indispensable to understanding the rise of language philosophy participation, especially Frege participation in language philosophy. If we find out that it is a convincing reason for explaining the need of thinking, in a language for philosophical exploration, then you can not find the Frugge struggle above, it is They do not seem necessary, so they are important, bypassing language barriers and direct access to our concepts and ideas. Historically, in particular, dealing with the second question, or there is a liability, we are Fregee at an early stage short of understanding of the concept of the relationship between language and thought and language.