Freeloaders assignment.docx - Running head THE FREELOADERS...

Runner: Freedom This is a criticism of Megan McArdle's article "The Freeloaders". In her article, McArdle believes that many people share and download music files for free (paragraph 2). She emphasized how music file sharing affects the success of the music industry. McArdle claims that music file sharing does not bring economic benefits to the music industry or the entertainment industry, but I complicate the problem because of lack of strong evidence to support her claim . She seems to be based on opinions. Conclusion - McArdle thinks that sharing music files is easy to evaluate and provide for thousands of years, while sharing free music files is damaging to individuals in the music and entertainment industries (paragraphs Five). Then, she has illegally copied intellectual property for centuries, but at that time copying was troublesome (paragraph 2). according to

Ethics is very different. Many people support this approach, it shows that it is harmless and can protect bondage from other people. On the other hand, other people criticize the word "cheat", "impersonation" or "greediness". That's it. Various analogies were made in the open discussion to link practice to a situation closer to familiar. Advocates compare this approach to: piggy-back use of connections paid by counterparties without sharing costs. This is particularly common in apartment buildings, many of which live within the normal range of a single wireless connection. While others pay, some can use free internet access. However, since many ISPs charge a monthly fee, there is no difference in the cost of network owners. Excessive piggyback can reduce the connection speed of the host and the host usually does not recognize the reason for the speed reduction.

Runner: Freedom This is a criticism of Megan McArdle's article "The Freeloaders". In her article, McArdle believes that many people share and download music files for free (paragraph 2). She emphasized how music file sharing affects the success of the music industry. McArdle claims that music file sharing does not bring economic benefits to the music industry or the entertainment industry, but I complicate the problem because of lack of strong evidence to support her claim . She seems to be based on opinions. Conclusion - McArdle thinks that sharing music files is easy to evaluate and provide for thousands of years, while sharing free music files is damaging to individuals in the music and entertainment industries (paragraphs Five). Then she said that people illegally copied intellectual property rights for centuries, but then it was troublesome to make copies (paragraph 2)