Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right

Ultimately, it is an approach to mobilize public opinion and global citizenship to build a universal human rights system that we can achieve. Its appearance is long and it is very long. From the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to the Roman Council on the Establishment of the International Criminal Court, the emergence of worldwide justice has been hurt by brutal acts that seriously infringe human dignity. But now there are legitimate means, and in stages, experiments and initiatives give hope. Political will is still motivated through constant mobilization, true thinking, professional contribution, and support to victims.

What is the promise of this worldwide justice promise? Let's quote the word of Nobel laureate José Salmago: "If there is such justice, no one will die of starvation or illness, there is such justice, for half of mankind , Life will not be a terrible judgment so far So for this kind of justice we have a practical norm that was established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 60 years ago.It is clear that the accuracy and purpose of the principle is clear From the point of view, this declaration may be useful as an alternative to the declaration.

In fact, we only care about the creed victims and our own political persuasion. We often tend to explain violations of opponent visits. At this historic moment, and as we celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the challenges facing human rights movements are clearly against the inhuman act of others.

In this regard, UNESCO hopes not only to integrate human rights approaches into poverty eradication strategies, but also to integrate poverty into the field of human rights. To define poverty as a benefit of human rights problems is political will to answer these questions and to mobilize public opinion to motivate them.

Another important goal of UNESCO is to ensure that the poor people are not those who do not understand their rights, especially those who must receive education, but really are regarded as victims. In this case, correspondence to poverty is education. Empowerment is the most important answer, however, as the poor lack capacity. They knew very well that their rights were infringed when the police beat them. They know that they should not be jailed without fair judgment. People intuitively know when people's rights are violated

In this regard, it is enough to read the World Bank's report ** It is clear that the poor himself has identified reasons for ongoing inequality, ie lack of participation, police treatment and so on. The problem is not to tell them their rights

Another purpose is to identify perpetrators. If the right is violated, that is, it is a victim, someone is in violation of this right. Beyond the government we need to strive to identify people who have made decisions. "I decided in China.

448 Thomas Pogge, Thomas Pogge, "Serious poverty as a human rights violation" (editor) has been released from poverty as human rights. Who owes a very bad person? (Oxford University: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 25. 449 Pogge, "Poverty and Human Rights in the World", page 4. 2. 450 Pogge, "Response to Critics: Serious poverty is an act of breach of duty", p. 55. As many people point out, as Bog himself admits, the way he believes the concept of harm and the way the world institutional order hurts poor people is a moral standard It is related. Ordering The global institutional order hurts the poor because it does not meet the minimum standards of justice, not just because it separately hurts the poor with the concept of specified harm. As Bog said, "The poor people in the world are hurt by us because their situation is worse than anyone else.

Strong commitment to Sen's poverty, freedom, and rights Amartya Sen played an important role in determining the relationship between poverty and human rights. He emphasized the relevance of freedom to development and human rights in the human rights framework to cope with poverty. By incorporating the concept of rights, capabilities, opportunities, freedoms and individual rights into discourse on poverty, Sen challenges the idea that basic freedom and human rights have nothing to do with poverty. Because happiness includes complete freedom, human development is integrated with the ability of people to do and the specific ability improvement defined as the range of leadership lifetime (Sen 1999).