Free Verse

Free poetry is a standard table or formalized table (an organization not emphasizing or emphasizing syllables) or a rhyming poem. Contrary to more traditional poetry, the latter tend to unify individual poems and use lengths, distance patterns and rhythms of repeating lines to associate them with other poems in the same verse. Mode or Organization But in the hands of many poets, free poetry balances the openness of free poetry, provides poetry elements with different emphasis, and provides repeating patterns or syntactic patterns (parallel) of grammatical elements Because it can be used, it will be a different organization. Maintain consistency and establish connection sense between lines. Even though it avoids traditional rhythm and rhyming, free verses sometimes join lines using rhythm patterns and occasional rhythms. The difference between free poems and other traditional forms of poetry is not to make up the whole poem, but occasionally to use only these elements. Therefore, poetry in free poems does not lack structure - or, in many cases, there are some examples of rhythmic composition and prosody - regular gauges to make up the whole poem, Does not maintain or use rhythm. In contrast, free verse depends more on subject, syntactic or semantic repetition and development to create consistency.

Walt Whitman's "grass leaves" are often thought of as incorporating free poetry into English poetry. Although not entirely correct (other experiments and usage preceded him), Whitman's poem helped to explore a wide range of themes by expanding the possibilities of free poetry and a wide range of ways to put together poetry It has the ability to adopt. The late nineteenth-century poet, like Matthew Arnold in the UK, further explored the use of free verse, but the French symbolic figures (Jules Laogue, Gustave Khan and Arthur Limbaud) call them free poems during this period I practiced things. Period Liberal poetry in the 20th century dominated many British poetry creations, including modernists (TS Eliot, Ezra Pound, William Carlos Williams etc) who saw more flexible open forms . Express modern fragmentation to accelerate the world

Free poetry has patterns and fields. The mode of inner sound, the selection of exact words, and the effect of association give the beauty of free poetry. As free picture poetry becomes disciplined, as position is acquired as a form of legal poetry. However, Herbert Reed pointed out that "the image of Ezra Pound has raised its musical structure to some extent and is not free to a certain extent." Yvor Winters is not bound by a traditional boundary and expresses it as "an attempt to expand experience by establishing" abnormal "practices." Poets have more expressive licenses and can better control the development of poetry. This will enable more natural and personalized poetry products.

The poets explained that free verse is not entirely free. Free poetry shows some elements of shape. Most liberal poeties keep naturally the practice of line of poetry in a sense in a sense at least with writing expression, while maintaining a potential contact level. TS Eliot wrote that Donald Hall said that "the form of free poetry is as binding and liberal as the form of Rondo," TS wrote wrote: "For those who want to do a good job, It is not free. "

Unfortunately, I accidently believe that many of today's ambitious poets (in fact few of the paid experts) are starting to use poetry opposition to free verses. Free poetry should not be repeated, but it is not where you expect them, but should have at least some aesthetically fun melodies and rhythm patterns, even rhymes. Personally, shackle is boring, there is no poetry or art but I do not like free poetry.