Free Speech

Freedom of expression is a leader. What society accepts people with minorities, unpopular and even disgusting views tends to speak more about the execution of human rights. Under international law, access to information and free expression are on both sides of the same coin, both of which bring great acceleration to the Internet and other forms of digital communication. At the same time, government and private stakeholders are accelerating their efforts to speed up the management of speech and information through censorship, access restrictions, and violence against people whose opinions and questions are considered dangerous or erroneous. From the earliest when we were called the Free Expression Fund, we adopted various forms of suppression in all media around the world.

People with such blind spots can only see bilateral discussions - professional "freedom of speech" and anti-"freedom of speech" - all rhetoric from the ideal utopia is rumored by our rumors It is said that it is strictly regulated The nightmare is free. But this world looks very different from mine. Language seems to be never "free" to me - it has always been limited by social customs and dynamics of power. Like most writers and public figures - including those who quickly wrote "freedom of speech" - sometimes I worry about writing or saying out of context, or being summoned or protested It will happen more than once) to my body). Imagine that such a protest constitutes an attack on my 'freedom of speech' - whether it is a misunderstanding or justice, this type of protest is simply a "freedom of speech" It is an expression of.

Freedom of speech is a wonderful motto. The maxims are very useful. But I do not believe that freedom of speech (as free opinion imagined) exists or that it is what I truly own. The truth of the problem is that there are two types of speech or expression: We think that we are willing to tolerate (as individuals or as society). You may cherish specific words, ideas, expressions or identities. But if sufficient people collectively refuse to accept it, then. . . You can scream "freedom of speech" above your lungs.

I believe that Biz believes that one of the principles he refers to is freedom of speech. I am also a fan to aspire for freedom of speech. However, freedom of speech is not without its ripple effect. In addition, the first amendment is very concise and the government says it can not limit your remarks. It does not apply to Twitter which is a private service. Do you know how bartenders can make you extremist? They have the right to do so. You do not have the right to become a militant man in their bar. Twitter has the right to drive them out of personal services. Donald Trump is hurrying every corner, shouting to everyone, grabbing each lady's ass and telling the bartender not to serve in the darkness. Twitter thinks this is the reason why this person goes to the bar. This is not a fundamental position. This is a kind of weak behavior