Free Speech

To find out the truth of something, people need to make some suggestions, ask a lot of questions, and sometimes think about problems that can not be explained. Otherwise, there is no elimination process; therefore, it is almost impossible to achieve the truth. Now, when we are trying to find the truth, when we are trying to express our beliefs and opinions, or when we usually use our constitutional rights, we are often criticized and even criticized I will. The freedom to express our opinion has been challenged because it can be said that critics of freedom of speech cause harm, things are controversial and prejudiced.

People with such blind spots can only see bilateral discussions - professional "freedom of speech" and "free speech" - unilateral landslides - all rhetoric from ideals is free It is said that it is a faintingistic nightmare. Our speech is strictly regulated. But the world looks very different from mine. It seems to me that the word is never "free" - it has always been limited by social customs and dynamics of power. Like most authors and public figures - including those who quickly write "freedom of speech" - I may worry that writing or out of context, being summoned or protested It happens times) to me. Imagine that such a protest constitutes an attack on my 'freedom of speech' - whether it is misleading or justice, this type of protest is simply a ' Freedom "expression.

Freedom of speech is a wonderful motto. The maxim is useful. However, it is not easy to believe that 'freedom of speech' exists (as free comments imagined), or that it is what I truly own. The truth of the problem is that there are two types of speech or expression: We think that we are willing to tolerate (as individuals or as society). You may cherish specific words, ideas, expressions or identities. But if enough people collectively refuse to accept it, then that time. . . You can scream "freedom of speech" All things you want on your lung, but it will not protect you

I think Biz thinks that one of the principles he is referring to is freedom of speech. I also love freedom of speech. However, it does not mean that freedom of speech is not affected. In addition, the first amendment is very concise, the government says it can not restrict your remarks. It does not apply to Twitter which is a private service. Do you know how bartenders can make you extremist? They have the right to do so. You do not have the right to become a radical man at their bar. Twitter, like militants, has the right to drive you out of their private service. Donald Trump is hurrying every corner, shouting to everyone, grabbing each woman's ass and telling the bartender not to serve in the darkness. Twitter thinks this is the reason why this person goes to the bar. This is not a fundamental position. This is a kind of weak behavior