free speech or just offensive

Freedom of speech, or simply attack. Recent controversial topics are the emergence of aggressive words and themes in the music industry, and they have spread. Whether this music artist should be punished because it has corrupted the hearts of those who hear it. Or whether the rights of musicians should be protected by the first amendment. The main problem to watch is that this music is very popular with young people. This popularity hit as media, parents, and organizations hit music and think they would destroy children.

They said that much freedom of speech was shocked. An offensive speech is being reconsidered. A slippery slope is formed. If you tell the Nazis that he is aggressive, there is a development created by Eugene Volokh, one of them wanting to silence the speech as another group is silenced "review cricket" I guess. So, if I understand Volokh's concern, if the black people say that no one can say n, Nazis will not want to ban the use of word biscuits, ah I do not know What?

Attacks on online offensive languages ​​are usually based on this - the Internet is a true democratic agreement. However, it does not mean that you can not restrict your speech just because the Internet as technology can achieve freedom of speech. Companies like Twitter may be committed to freedom of speech but they are banned by Twitter and other social media platforms and comment threads - not meaning that freedom of speech is being violated . Mr. Howard Angle, Executive Director of the Canadian Constitution Fund, said "The freedom of speech is not relevant to private companies." He is a lawyer and is deputy chief of staff of the former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The obvious hypothesis of advocates of freedom of speech is that aggressive speech is basically harmless - that is, words that are not clearly related to results. But it seems irresponsible to ask if the speech can encourage someone to behave badly. Clearly, speech can lead to results, often triggering actions. The main purpose of the language is to communicate and influence others. Otherwise, there are billions of dollars of advertisements, political institution campaigns, ambitious speakers and books, citizen-driven petitions, public service announcements, church sermons, and countless churches there is no. Another proven example where a speech causes another person to act