Free Speech on the Internet

Freedom of speech on the Internet Freedom of expression recently has always become a big problem on the Internet. However, I think that the right way of thinking about "policy market" is to propose that freedom of speech is greater than recent prohibition of "obscene" Internet posting. Let's start with the question, "Why is freedom of speech?" Congress prohibits certain people from making "obscene" statements by the demands of other people concerned about feeling offended by such statements. what?

In the late 1990s, I led the government's allegations of excessive regulation of Internet content, including the establishment of Article 230 of the Communications Regulation Law, which is a law to maintain freedom of speech via the Internet. Likewise, I wrote an Internet tax free law that prohibits Internet access taxes and does not allow discrimination between digital goods and services and their physical counterparts. My priority from 1998 to 2017 has not changed. And then, like today, I am suffering from deep-seated telecommunications policies of openness, transparency, discrimination prohibition, competitiveness and freedom of online. In 1998, this meant that third-party Internet service providers (ISPs) guaranteed to continue evolving from "walled garden" services to today's services.

Today, in order to protect freedom of speech on the Internet, I will support citizen efforts everywhere. Today, the Supreme Court heard a debate to decide on the constitutionality of the Telecommunications Regulation Law to criminalize certain statements on the Internet. It is precisely because of the hard work of the local netizens and the freedom of speech that this problem is gathering public attention. I think that the CDA is unconstitutional from the beginning, and the Supreme Court is waiting for judgment on this case.

I greatly expect the Internet. It has the ability to speak for the quiet people and provides a free expression channel. That is called the great hero of freedom of speech and this is why the Internet continues to be censored very severely in countries with authoritarian regimes. From the dictator's point of view, unrestricted access to the Internet seems like a big threat, and it seems very likely. Unlimited communication can spread virus infections such as freedom of speech, government representatives, freedom of religion, human rights and democracy. Honestly, what kind of dictators can not guide what ideas might "infect" their population?