I am praising the African-American culture that produced the civil rights movement as a Chinese-American for a long time as I am protesting the freedom of the Chinese government's speech, censorship and self-determination. This is a person who is discriminated in historical confrontation and insists that it has the right to equality between men and women. Regardless of whether it promotes nonviolence and integration when necessary, or whether it promotes separation and violence, these men and women claim to use freedom of speech on the streets, sentences and television doing.
Review is a repression of speech or other public communications determined by the government, media agency, or other regulatory agency (Wikipedia, 1), objective, harmful, sensitive, politically inaccurate, or otherwise It is convenient not to be considered. - The main purpose of this paper is to confirm whether the first amendment is too far to protect the freedom of speech, such as commitment pledges. Therefore, in order to establish this discussion, this article first considers the outline and restriction of discourse. Later in this article we will also consider various aspects of freedom in the classroom.
Whenever an activist protests public speech (regardless of his or her affiliation) or publishes specific books or articles, such action threatens "freedom of speech" or "review" We will inevitably claim to make up. Recently, after the silence of the presidential inauguration ceremony (through boxing) of the white nationalist leader Richard Spencer (through boxing) and protestors tried to cancel the announcement of the Bribert editor Miloianopoulos at the university, they heard these types of claims It was. . Washington and the University of California, Berkeley. Some people who take this position are purely for political reasons - they share the views of Spencer and Yiannopoulos, quoting "freedom of speech" to make their ideology invincible I am showing it. Many people who disagree with these views may argue the absolute principle of freedom of speech and their reasoning can be summarized as follows:
Carol: In my opinion, John Stuart Miller's most powerful assertion about freedom of speech is that if you restrict speech, you have to decide which government authorities have the right to review. It may not be a government agency that you trust that you review. Companies are easily censored. There is also a website onlinecensorship.org, another team called EFF and Visualizing Impact that seeks to track the occurrence of this situation. The straight line is very clear. If you are a very strong person, you let others leave the platform. If you are a man without power, you will not do so