Free Education Should Be Provided to Third World Children

When I struck my heavy eyes, soft knock sound that I woke up from my sleep in all the sounds of Delhi's traffic. Vaguely, I peeked into the window at once. My gaze fell to a boy standing outside the window, his palm sticking out and begging for money. When the bones and hands and feet shook from the cold wind, his clothes were broken and dirty, and it was hanging slowly on a thin body. The boy who was under 7 years old was dirty: his hair was covered with sweat and oil, and his ash and dirt were dark.

Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), which began in 2001, is the main program of the Government of India and provides free compulsory education for children between the ages of 6 and 14. SSA aims to provide high quality basic education including language skills. One of the goals is to "focus on giving children life skills education to focus children to focus on basic education of satisfactory quality and achieve success." In education

Governments of each country provide education. Children's education is mandatory in almost every country in the world, children must stay at school until the age of 16; education for children is free. As children go on to university, tuition fees are usually carried out by the institution and expenses are different. Some countries provide university education for free, others do not. But because it brings many benefits to them, the country needs to provide free education for students.

Yes, college education should be free. University education should be offered to all children who desire it. This should be provided for free. It is morally wrong that teenagers and his family are obliged to bear the educational debt of thousands of dollars. Learning must not exceed anyone's range. Learning and education are not rich privileges. Currently, the default rate of university loans is at the highest level ever. We have people of all generations who have begun to suffer from a large debt and a very small employment market in their lives. Our society makes it possible for these young losers to become losers, and they are beginning to be disadvantaged.

Considering the world of Warren Jeffs, we left a very difficult problem. How much freedom should parents teach children's education? In answering this question, we can admit that some parents are very bad. Whether they are good or not, they will not bring up their children. If these parents are allowed to dominate freely to lead children's education, they can cause some serious harm. Not all parents are love, courteous and kind. So, how much freedom should parents teach children's education?