Introduction This article analyzes Janna Thompson's 2005 paper "Apology, Justice, Respect: Important Defense of Political Apology". The paper was presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Australian expert and Applied Ethics Institute held in Adelaide from 28th to 30th September. This article can be found at http://www.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/gig/aapae05/documents/thompson.pdf. Conclusion This paper critically appreciates the importance of negotiating and expanding discourse in setting apologies, especially in political and diplomatic situations.
I would like to talk about the political background of this dialogue. Of course, people can read once again that reading apologies is a long-running symbol. You may say that individuals in justice are confronted with illegal thugs or unfair political rules. This is also the problem that Plato occupied in the Republic, but at that time the person named Glaucon was a brother of Plato, but was he only Socrates or was it just a reputation of justice . Socrates said it would be better if it was done, even though it would lead to persecution and death. But judgment is not a permanent symbol of justice and injustice, it is a real historical event that happens at a specific moment in political time, and this shows how we understand these two cases I think that I will decide. Against and against Socrates
Plato 's apology clearly recorded Socrates' judgment. We insist that it is an accurate copy of Socrates' speech, but the title is misnomer. The "apology" used in this case is not a translation of the Greek original title's apology but a British translation. "Apology" in Greek meaning means defense rather than apology. This will help explain the content of the conversation, Socrates did everything, but apologized. But this is not the end. Both Xenophon and Plato believe that Socrates actually took the way before his death. His loyal student had enough money and influence to bribe prison guards and made sure that his leader escaped from Athens and some deaths, but in the end Socrates He did not accept it. Just as Socrates refused to defend himself in court.