Formulating a Revision Plan

Below is the correction plan written by the students. Please note that focus is on specific actions to be taken

When we received the first paper on the first module, we got a total of 15 points. With my score, I have the opportunity to see them (students / professors) believe in the fields I need to improve. At the top of the title, I had three of all the categories. In the content I should focus on, the bottom is deeper

In order to improve my thesis, I will explain my paper more clearly. It confirms that it is linked to other parts of the article, so it has a strong position and standing. Regarding focus, I intend to make my paper fit the needs of the reader or to answer the question.

In order to develop and manage ideas, we need to develop and support our ideas more fully. I need to think about more important ideas so that I can support what I want and add more evidence to support my paper. Another mistake, what I change is to make sure my idea is clear and clear.

Regarding the description of the organization, we will change the conclusion, so we will not repeat, disable it or make it irrelevant. I need to rearrange my ideas and thoughts in an easy-to-understand way. Also in this section we need to do better transactions.

In style notes, you need to come back and think of more effective word selection and phrases. The last section I criticized is about the convention. I intend to double check my mechanical error and the words I use in articles.

In general, with a few exceptions, I can understand the level I am receiving. After modifying my paper I would like to better understand my mistakes to help prevent it from happening in the future.

DueDueDueDue June 2nd June 2nd June 2nd: Global Revision: Global Revision: Global Revision: Global Revision :::: Pocket 1: Global Revision, Draft, Reflections before the writing and writer's reflection. We will add a summary and overview to be completed one week ago. Pocket 2: Both of your previous papers have my comment about them, its transcript and all preliminary material. It also brings an additional hard copy of the last global revision. Step 3: Step 3: Step 3: Step 3: Peer Review Comment Comment Comment Review Review will take place on June 2. They will take all courses. You need to get there on time to participate in this process. You need to be reviewed and reviewed by other students. (Do not look at more than one student thesis in each PR exercise.) If you missed the whole class (a part or a part) in the class, you can use the guided process during the extracurricular lesson, We need to carry out this process with students.

Based on peer review, you can have the class produce revision plans based on sample articles and allow students to receive revision training. By doing this, you can prove with an emphasis on adding, moving, or deleting content with an excellent revision plan to pursue the best impact on the reader, not editing. After this activity you can ask the students to suggest a revision plan for their thesis. Also, as long as time permits, you can see the best plan in the class.

Sometimes the plan has to be fixed soon. If this happens, the business operator must submit a notice of the revision plan and submit a copy of the revised plan to the agent in response to the request to the MSHA for approval. Copies of the proposed ventilation plan and suggested amendments must also be posted on the mine bulletin board. These documents will be published until they are approved, withdrawn, or rejected. If the plan or revision is approved, the representative provided on request confirms a copy of the plan and a revision to that plan. If directly infected, the operator must notify the plan or revision before the approved ventilation plan or revision is effective.

Mine Safety and Health Laboratory, Ministry of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration