Foreign and Domestic Terrorist Threats Require Fundamentally Different Responses

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the argument that in the United States, countries with excellent technology do not always win regular conflicts. It can not be denied that three basic principles must be fulfilled in order to ensure victory in war. First, the motivation for political leadership must be unified. Secondly, the efforts of the military, the integration of the practice of war, must be unified. Finally, the passion of this country has to move in the same direction. War trying to work outside these principles will not achieve that purpose.

This does not mean that the threat of foreign terrorists to the United States is not an important threat. However, although the terrorist acts of 2001 involved the United States in the war with terrorism, the threat of Muslims and extreme right countries has become increasingly domestic since then. Since 2001, about half of the people suspected of violent Muslim attacks in the United States were born there, including Orlando's nightclub shooters, 85% are American citizens or legal residents. For the extreme right wing - it constitutes an important part of the overall threat - most people are born in America. With regard to ideology, from the viewpoint of the number of attackers, attackers, and victims, threats occur mainly in the country.

In our own government, we need checks and balances, but since we want to protect all threats both at home and abroad through national power, we are usually Hobbes. The controversy centers on the question of who is the main threat. Terrorists, gangsters on the street, Mexican or foreign agent. However, this time it was a hostile foreign government that launched a "cyber attack", which includes "propaganda, fake information, and the use of information technology for psychological manipulation". Advertising can be a weapon of war when their sources are designated enemies, and big data can defeat democracy.

It is only necessary to see the United States to confirm that poor governance exacerbates totalitarianism and it is likely to become mainstream. President's "extreme review" remarks focused on the threat of foreign terrorism against the United States, but the threat of domestic terrorism was widespread. Reforming the political process such as stopping division can solve extremism issues in the United States more effectively. This does not mean that the threat of foreign terrorists to the United States is not an important threat. However, although the act of terrorism in 2001 of terrorism in 2001 fell into the war with terrorism, the threat of Muslims and extreme right countries has become increasingly domestic since then.