Ford lawyers blast 'numerous false claims' about FBI investigation ahead of Kavanaugh confirmation vote

Christina Blythe Ford's lawyer condemned the Senator with FBI's brutal poll on Friday, Friday, which publicly condemned the sexual assault of a woman from the Supreme Court, Brett Cavano. Claims of "false" allegations for investigations over multiple days

Attorneys Debracats, Lisa Banks and Michael Bromwich reportedly said that FBI 's supplementary background check, including an interview with nine individuals, was "meaningless" in a statement later Friday and Ford said in a statement late Friday, In addition to the content submitted to the Judiciary Committee, no interview or attendance at the hearing was given last week and further evidence was offered.

The lawyer wrote as follows. "The FBI survey does not include an interview with Dr. Ford and Cavano judge, which is not a meaningful investigation in any way."

"If FBI interviewed Dr. Ford, she would answer questions about Judge Cabana's attacks, including questions Mitchell and the judicial committee members did not bring up at the hearing," they added. "She was able to provide firm evidence including her medical record and phone, and she will send information about the attack to the reporter by phone before she is nominated by the Supreme Court."

The letter refused to disclose the name of a particular senator. However, Katz, Banks, and Bromwich reported the FBI survey as "completed" after reporting to the Senate GOP Sens. It seems that it is targeting Jeff Flake (Arizona) and Susan Collins (Main).

"I think that Susan Collins is cited as saying it is very thorough, but there is no new and definitive information, which is accurate," Mr. Flake told reporters on Thursday.

The lawyers concluded that they continued to believe her complaints against Kavanaugh, who denied Ford's allegations and charges from Ford and the other two women.

"We believe that Christine Blasey Ford and we are fully supporting her, the Senators claim they desire a dedicated debate.

Finally, Ford's testimony before the committee was not enough to convince many of the senators to vote for Cavano by breaking the Republican Party. While investigations by the FBI could not confirm her claim, Democrats condemned the process itself as an erroneous act and was intentionally manipulated by the White House to reach this conclusion. Ford and Cavano did not receive an interview with FBI and Swetnick's claim was not investigated. Ramirez received an interview, but her lawyer never said that the investigator never said she told a witness that she could prove her claim

When we were waiting for the confirmation of Brett Cavano and the outcome of an ongoing FBI investigation, the United States left a few hours in his testimony with Christina Blythe Ford in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. . Both are very emotional and heartfelt. Ford sounds like a person whose heart was hurt, and Cavano sounds like a cheated person. Even if their stories are not exactly the same, you will want to trust people on the stand. But who should you believe? Do we assume that "believe the victim" or "the innocent" the accused before being guilty? Cautious research on the science and nature of human memory, the historical trend of the accuracy of witness testimony, and the universality of false beliefs suggests that the most rational assumption is to believe in both I will.

Especially interviewed? Kavanaugh's lawyer, Christine Blasey Ford, said the FBI never had an interview with her. There is no suggestion that FBI interviewed the third plaintiff, Jules Wattnick, or a person related to Sweetnick. Cavano - nominated by the Supreme Court - did not talk with FBI during the investigation