For and Against Pacifism

Supporting and opposing pacifist pacifism agrees that peace is the best goal and is the best means to achieve peace through peaceful means. Therefore, pacifists refuse to use physical forces even in defense, and continuing war is always wrong. There is controversy in supporting and opposing its widespread use when it comes to pacifism. Discussion includes the teachings of Jesus, it teaches us that he loves us as ourselves ourselves, and that we should turn our cheeks against us into violence .

All these arguments against pacifism and "realism" - as well as a systematic analysis of the morality of war - are effective. They believe that the theory of war of justice is a practical theory of moral war. But the investigation of simply the theory of war - and its consistent practice in what we call "the war on terror" - prove that it is neither practical nor ethical. In the context of a legitimate war theory, it is a prescription for suicide in innocent countries, hence a very unfair norm.

I am a pacifist myself. This is certainly not what I want. However, since I found that pacifism is the end and a morally consistent position if opposed to violence, I call myself a 1. My pacifism is the result of a lifelong attempt to improve humanity and self improvement. I have nearly as many Facebook friends as twitter followers and only a few. When I posted, my information was adapted to my audience. I have never encountered serious parental Nazi emotions in any of my news except the absurd things that I shared with my friends and absurd things. There is no reason to believe that someone in my social realm will accept the feelings of sincere Nazi. I will talk with my friends and colleagues about anti-violence ("You should bomb North Korea"), if you mainly know me through the Internet, there is no such career .

Let us first point out the famous fact that personal pacifism is too weak to guarantee peace. This is opposed to traditional pacifism. (For example, at the end of the nineteenth century Vladimir Soroviev convincedly opposed Tolstoy in his three dialogues, recently pointed out and pointed out war crimes against the recent Ottoman army's eastern civilians in the eastern Balkans. Like other areas, a basic structure in the form of an international system is necessary 23 Without this common peace guarantee structure people will live forever in the international wild west forever In this case , The obligation of each country is to arms themselves to prepare for war, otherwise the citizens can not protect it, think that it is a potential threat and respond as your preparation increases