Flaws of Capital Punishment

Some people think that the death penalty of the death penalty is good for our law enforcement body as it helps to reduce potential crime. If people kill someone, they know that they are badly punished, but others think that it may be in the form of revenge. This is a way that society says that human life is valuable and we do not tolerate criminal acts that deprive of our own lives. A serious crime should be severely punished, but the death penalty contradicts what we have taught, that is, "There can not be just two mistakes."

Immediately after the death penalty, the death penalty was too big. This is because the focus of the death penalty is in human life. Innocent people were executed or released within a few weeks after being executed, which became a general topic of night news. The legal system can not unduly implement the death penalty correctly. Every day anyone who can not hire a lawyer must appoint a lawyer according to the Constitution. Nearly 30% of Americans can not pay medical expenses. These lawyers pay an average of $ 5 per hour and there is little incentive to collect all valuable materials to fully support defendants. A dilemma is formed when all materials of the prosecutor's fingers are summarized into an equation. If there are valid cases in the defendant, does he have the opportunity to arrange it properly in front of the jury?

The capital punishment should not be proud of American support. The death penalty is a cruel act of bringing the United States back to the Middle Ages. Clearly, the capital punishment is flawed. The worst of these flaws is that this person is innocent or innocent. The death penalty is the final decision of our legal system, which may be wrong. The death penalty is an ineffective deterrent, a moral violation and a fundamental human rights violation.

As mentioned above, most of the opposition to the death penalty is based on the disclosure of defects in the defense of the death penalty. However, there are also more direct attacks such as abolition of the death penalty. Because it is dignified, inhuman, or against love. Corporal punishment such as extreme types of death sentences such as whips and gambling are no longer accepted due to their insults. Through similar reasoning, the death penalty should also be abolished. However, even if we acknowledge that the death penalty infringes our responsibility of dealing with people with dignity, humanity, love, this may not be enough to justify the abolition of this practice. Dignity, humanity, and love are basic morals and therefore are essentially superficial. In other words, they bring morally bound and moral dilemmas in terms of value until it has a stronger clash of responsibilities