Flag Desecration is a Heinous Act that Must be Banned

The flag is an absolutely forbidden act to respect his country and will agree with the proposed amendment: "The Constitution and the State have the right to prohibit the actual binding of American flags." We are a free country and the unity we have achieved over the years. When we vote to allow our leaders to provoke the national flag, they are completely devoid of respect and concern for the past, present and future of the United States.

A national flag is a term that applies to the national flag or violates the agreement of the flag and is a kind of behavior that deliberately destroys, damages or destroys the national flag in the public place. Normally, in the case of the flag, such action is aimed at presenting a political view on the country or its policy. In some countries, there are laws prohibiting destruction methods (such as burning in public places) or prohibiting specific uses (such as commercial use), but these laws require that their flags and flags of other countries You can distinguish between.

In this case the question of whether the state or federal government has the right to ban the national flag is raised. Since the flag is the only symbol of respect, the basic rules that apply to other symbols do not apply to American flags. I can not convince the argument that burning the flag is a form of protected freedom of speech. Because the cost to protect this form of freedom is too high. Freedom of speech can not be protected any more by defending the flag

Part of the first amendment is divided by modifying the national flag ban. I understand the crime caused by the symbol of our country. However, as it will deprive the right to oppose the government of the people, it is forbidden to include amendments to the constitution prohibiting the flag. The revised bill was approved recently on March 29, 2000 and I agree to approve the withdrawal of the proposed amendment in the future, but I only support the right to the flag rather than supporting the flag.

Banner fix is ​​a solution to this problem. Attempts to reduce the expression of burning flags are very rare. Professor Robert Justin Goldstein recorded about 45 flag burning incidents that occurred over more than 200 years since the passage of the flag in 1777 and the parliament passed in 1989 and the Supreme Court passed the "Flag Protection Act" Was rejected. About half of them occurred during the Vietnam War. This modification is the beginning of a way to adjust some form of expression, not the end. It has enabled Congress to begin to define the meaning of "flag" and "亵渎". Congress can develop a wide range of rules for specific applications, using flags as symbols everywhere from business, art to memorial.