Final Discussion Board on Simulation Article and a Reflection

Posted by: http: //dx.doi.org.fscproxy.framingham.edu/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.04.004 Abstract This study includes a three-month follow-up study of postgraduate students in medical surgery It was. Using Australian University ResusciAnneSimulator® and SimMan®, 50 graduate students received high fidelity simulation training. After that, 38 out of 50 students agreed to complete follow-up survey in 3 months after graduation. The four objectives of this research are to: a) assess the frequency of use of emergency response skills, b) to examine the degree of improvement of response, c) to evaluate the most useful aspects of simulation-based learning, and d)

Twenty articles are discussing the use of group dialogue or discussion as the basis of a reflective educational strategy. About half of the 20 articles used in the panel discussion (n = 11), participants were first asked to write narratives to contemplate their well-thought clinical situation and then discussed in the group environment It was. In the remaining articles (n = 9) used in the panel discussion, the participants reflected clinical stories and experiences provided by educators or researchers. The remaining three articles present introspective interventions focused on individual written stories designed to explore clinical experience (Kuiper, 2002; Rittman, 1995; Rosenal, 1995). Reflective stories are shared only with researchers and educators, leading to greater learning and understanding of individuals who contribute to the story.

Another concept of Reflective Panel Discussion Theme is to guide and guide the Reflective dialog using Facilitator. In 12 articles we are discussing the use of counselors to guide, guide and extend the introspective search of shared narratives in a group environment. Of the twelve articles, one article uses participants from fellows as a facilitator and acts as a role holder in turn (Jenkins, 2007). In the four articles, educators (n = 3) or nurses (n = 1) worked as facilitators. Four articles discussed the role of counselors filled by nurse researchers (n = 3) or external clinical care experts (n = 1). The remaining three articles do not explicitly explain who is the facilitator of group dialogue.