Female Representation on the Board of Directors

Hillman, Shropshire, and Cannella (2007) are trying to answer the question that some organizations have women in their board, while others do not. In the evaluation, we determine the objectives of the research, the basic assumptions and theories of the development, identify the hypotheses and research methods used to validate the hypotheses, and discuss the results before reaching the conclusion. Research questions are appropriate as it focuses on the characteristics of organizations that may be pointers to women's representative levels at the board.

In a recent survey, we found that there is no relevance between the female representatives of the Board of Directors and the companies 'companies' sustainability and environmental policy. I am surprised at these findings. Because women are good at actually creating a sustainable future. According to a survey by McElhaney and Mobasseri 2012, from an environmental perspective, companies with a large number of females actively invest in products that help improve climate change, reduce carbon emissions, and reduce environmental impact There is a possibility of development. . Their packaging

One of the starting points is to look at statistics. Only 4% of Fortune 500 CEOs are females, the North American board of directors occupies only 12-14% of women's representatives, Canadian women councilors account for only 24% of the total number of parliamentarians, the US Senate I have a 20% tax rate. In 2014 the most charitably explained was that prejudice against female leaders still existed. I also learned about the phenomenon "glass cliff". When a woman becomes a leader, it may be a company with a problem with a higher risk of failure. In terms of politics, research shows that women are highly likely to be elected, and these elections have been lost in previous elections and there is no chance of winning in the next election. Remember that when Kim Campbell became prime minister, it was unlikely that her party would be re-elected.

In recent years, pressure to society and investors to appoint female directors as board members is rising. The number of female officers appointed is small, it is actually a sign of a problem, not a cause. In one country, especially in Asia, men are attracting attention, and there is a high possibility of being a board of directors rather than women. However, many of the issues related to women working at the company's board of directors can not be considered impossible as women are considered to be actively contributing to the work and processes of the board of directors I will. Increasing the number of female directors brought profits to the company. According to Douglas M. Branson, these benefits are good examples of diversity and function of other women, board members, and economic purchasing power.