Far East Religious-Phylosophical Ideas: Differences and Similarities

Question 2: Hindu Vedanta teaches Atoman's view, in contrast to Ananman's teaching in Buddhism. Compare and contrast these philosophical ideals. It is similar in many respects, but Hinduism and Buddhism differ greatly in the ideal of the human soul. On the one hand, Hinduism believes in Atman, or the eternal human soul, and on the other hand, Buddhism faith Anatoman rejecting the existence of eternal self. Buddhist beliefs believe that people's existence will change as they experience the surrounding world, so there is neither "self", specifically "permanent" nor "personality".

Recently, I visited important religious places of various religions in our country, and I was shocked by the same similarity. Normally, when we talk about religion, culture, thought, we are worried that our differences are different from yours, and I have been much better than you. When the war started, the kingdom lost this simple aspect by its religion, culture, concept, or a better combination of all these. Recently I have read about various types of history, so this aspect of my investigation comes primarily from the lens I recently saw, I saw every aspect around me.

If I immigrate to the Far East, I am ready to deal with very obvious cultural, linguistic, commercial, religious and social differences. But I just moved to all parts of the country. Through obvious similarity, I was fascinated by a false sense of security, then blindly stood by the difference. If you are following my previous post on Medium, or an article I posted to Facebook before, I think you already understand my general theme. My focus lies in rediscovering and redefining creativity (and myself) in the new environment. I hope that during the process of sharing, I have helped others in the process. (And will continue to do so)