Famine, Affluence, and Morality

In Singer, P (1972), the main argument of "famine, wealth, and morality" is to persuade readers to understand wealth, the government solves the problem of famine, especially in East Bengal You should help. In addition, the singer also used Utilitarianism. Therefore, according to Mosser, K. (2010) "Brief Introduction of Philosophy", "Action Utilitarian Apply Utilitarian Concepts to Specific Actions, emphasize what morality is and create the greatest benefit for the great people. .. contrasting Doctrine of Utilitarianism with Rules (2010, Glossary).

"Famine, wealth, morality" is an article written by Peter Singer in 1971 and published in philosophy and public relations in 1972. It believes that HNWIs are morally obliged to donate more normal resources due to humanitarian causes than Western culture. . This article is inspired by the starvation of the Bangladesh Liberation War refugees, taking the claim as an example as an example, but singer's debate is broad, not limited to Bangladesh's example. This article is widely chosen as an example of Western ethical thinking.

New Yorker magazine states that Peter Singer is the most influential and living philosopher in the world. He cites the subject of his epoch-making essay "famine, prosperity and morality" and claims that people have the same moral obligation to people far away from them. What are our obligations to people who need it so much? Governments and individuals of the Western countries focus on this issue, mainly on the responsibilities each country should bear to immigrants and asylum seekers, and whether Western democracy should intervene to end these remote conflicts I am faced more and more. People are running away

Singer's 1972 article "Famine, Prosperity and Morality" paved the way for controversy on modern poverty ethics. If he can detail the principle of sacrifice and it is possible to prevent adverse events without sacrificing other things with similar moral significance, it is said that it is morally obligatory to do so I pointed out.

In 1972, a young philosopher Peter Singer published "famine, prosperity and morality" and quickly became one of the most widely discussed papers in applied ethics. Throughout this article, Singer expressed his view that we have the same moral obligation as those far from us. We believe that choosing not to send lives to the hungry people on the other side of the earth is morally equivalent to ignoring drowning children. If we can help, we have to do - and any excuses are hypocritical. Shin's extreme position on the moral obligation to others has been a call for powerful weapons and continues to challenge people's attitude towards extreme poverty. Today is also the central presence of a man who thinks that we should help other people than us.