Families who do not send their children to government-financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education.

While some people think that parents are not allowed to pay taxes when children are studying at home or private school, others think this is necessary for everyone. Regardless of whether I have children or not, I think that everyone must pay the same amount to maintain a good education at public schools.

First of all, it is much easier for the government to get the same tax from everyone. Because it is difficult to control all families with children and to control where they are learning. For example, many families with children like to travel, so they move from one town to another. So, how do you tax in this situation? More importantly, children often can change schools from private schools to public schools, which means that they have to pay for a certain period of time.

Second, the level of demographic education plays a very important role not only in the social structure of society but also in the status of the country in the global stage. In other words, all citizens need to receive adequate education, but because everyone can not receive very expensive education, everyone has an obligation to maintain an appropriate level of education at school There is. Some people think that they do not mind, but because they are social welfare, everyone must receive education.

Third, the government has to hire more employees to observe children's learning from their families studying at public schools and to collect taxes. Therefore, the government needs to bear the cost of new recruits.

Overall, some families want to pay taxes when children are not studying in public schools, but other families believe that this is the responsibility of everyone. As I said, I agree with the latter position. Because it is difficult for the government to control where children learn, who should pay taxes, who should not pay.

Secondly, because families who do not send children to schools funded by the government are part of society, improving the quality of education will benefit society as a whole and society as a whole, so taxes on universal education You should pay. As a result, they will get them. For example, engineers and physicians graduate from government-funded schools, and these families will benefit from their experience in architecture and treatment.

Theme of thesis Family members who do not go to schools where the government funds for children do not need to pay taxes to support universal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Unfortunately, even though families prefer public schools, they sometimes can not let their children go to school. These families are not only bothered by paying fees at other schools but are also forced to pay taxes to support public schools they are not using. (323 words) 116 Households not sending children to a government-funded school should not be required to pay taxes to support universal education. Please state the reason for the answer, and include any relevant examples of your own knowledge and experience. Families who do not go to public schools for children should pay taxes to support public education. Every child in my country has to go to school and all the children are welcome to register at his / her local public school. Some families choose to let their children go to other schools. But public schools are used by most of our children and have to be open to everyone.

Some people have their children go to non-public schools. Some people have no children, but they are forced to pay taxes to support the national education system. Many people argue that parents who do not go to public schools for children do not need to pay taxes. But I absolutely disagree with this. Public schools are operated by the government. The cost of public school is very cheap. Most of the students enrolled in public schools are low-income families. Therefore, if these schools are closed due to lack of funds. As a result, parents can not afford the cost of private schools, so many students can not receive education. As a result, the government can not reduce inequality and only wealthy students can receive education.

Payment to families who should not bring children to schools funded by the government should not be required.