Eyewitness Testimony is Not Completely Accurate

Witness witness In my opinion, the witness testimony is not completely accurate. Human memory is a very complex system and not always correct. I think the witness's testimony is not a fair way to judge whether a person is committing a crime. The longer the experiment takes, the more people you forget. If you can not practice it many times, you will soon forget it, and how can you expect to use the witness's testimony as a crime that occurred months or years ago .

Is the witness's testimony of the witness's testimony reliable and accurate? A case study supporting this is included. EWT is evidence provided by someone who relies on their own memory to witness certain events or crimes. The statement usually includes an explanation of the criminal trial and the subsequent personal identity at the crime scene. EWT may rely on rebuilding memory (Bartlett, 1932).

Eyewitness testimony is usually an oral record provided by an individual who experienced a general case (usually a crime). The witness's testimony is highly dependent on the individual's ability to accurately account for the event. In a trial, the jury was mostly convinced because of the witness statements. In addition, witnesses are the focus of the decision in cases where we can hardly collect important evidence. Testimony has been claimed to be unreliable, mainly because it is based on error prone memory that may be affected by various factors. The argument in this paper is to identify and evaluate the accuracy of this assertion by identifying and evaluating factors that affect memory and by examining experiments and case studies to draw conclusions about this problem is there. Memorandum of witnesses' reliability is an important issue as the proportion of mistakes in the identification and prosecution of the accused is high

The study shows that the statement that the witness's testimony is reliable and accurate is verifiable and that the identity of the witness is easily distorted without the witness's perception. More specifically, the memory is assumed to provide accurate, not exact experience records like cameras. The evolution of memory gives us a sense of personal identity and leads our actions. We tend to pay attention to one experience, exaggerate, try to reduce or ignore other experiences. Memory is plastic

The memory is accurate, but it is not always accurate. For example, the witness's testimony is famous for being unreliable, even relatively recent dramatic events. Memory of events is a superposition of emotions, mixed with interpretation, overflowing with imagination, skeptical about its effectiveness, memory is de facto detail. For example, according to a record, victims of recorded child abuse were reinterpreted as adults after years and 38% of women denied memory abuse.