Exploring Time Travel

The basic requirement for the possibility of time travel is to assume that the future and the past are somewhat realistic. However, according to a popular perspective, assuming that only the present is true and that there is a contradiction between the past and the future, it is assumed that the past or the future is also true. According to this metaphysical Heraclitus concept, the future is truly open. There is no area for determining the facts of the future and residents of the future can not identify or talk.

This book is basically a long article on time travel. The author first explored the origin of the concept of time travel at H.G. Wells' Time Machine, then he continues to explore mass culture, history, and philosophical time travel. What he did not explore is a practical aspect of time travel, and he did not discuss its science, physics or mathematics. However, he solved the paradox accompanying time travel, like his grandfather's paradox. What happens if you can go back and kill your grandfather? Does it change now? Are you a gift? Or if I can kill Adolf Hitler before Adolf Hitler takes power? This is worth pondering. He also talked about the time capsule and the completeness of the watch. Overall, I think this book is a brief introduction of "inspiring science and inspiring the science of art"

Many movies explore contradictions of time travel. As all actions have a potential impact, time travel must be combined with other types of suspicious types of travel - through dimensions to other reality. Returning to the past, even if not so important, if you changed the facts of history, you will not be able to make changes in the future if you go back. Since we can not make these changes, this means that they happen as usual. This is particularly true when people imagine deliberately returning to change something. If you succeed, they will not happen, so there is no incentive to go back and change them. So you will never do this. Discounts are various reality, and contradictions in time travel seem to affect free will. Professor of philosophy