The relationship between religion and morality continues to be debated and discussed in detail by philosophers. Whether they are tightly intertwined or whether they can exist independently of each other. One argument aimed at providing a solution to this controversial problem is sacred command theory. In this article, the reasoning provided by God's command theory is that it is improper defense of religious dependence on morality as it can not provide logical justification for God's moral guidance I will argue.
In this article I will discuss the relationship between religion and morality. I will first solve the questions raised by those who have religious beliefs. Then I will study the relationship between morality and culture. Next, we will explore whether people without religious beliefs are truly ethical than those with religious beliefs. Finally, I will dispute my argument. This claim does not mean that people who believe in God are immoral. Armed Israeli Baruch Goldstein entered the Hebron mosque on 25th and was opened to a Muslim group during Ramadan. Goldstein killed 29 Muslims trained by the Galil Assault Rifle and the Israeli Army and hurt innumerable people (Wells). His behavior later caused a riot in the city of Hebron, about 60 people died.
The first step to answering these questions is to determine the relationship between religion and morality found in the moral and religious traditions of the world (Little and Twis). Generally, religion is the source of authoritative ethics, the main motivation for ethical demands. However, there are major changes in this general concept. Is religion the only source of ethics, or can these norms or some of them be discovered or created in other ways? Is the source of authority the will of the holy legislator, or is the inner goodness of the thing itself? Does the motivation for ethical behavior be based on religious love for your own interests or would you like a final compensation for the difficult need for ethical behavior?