Exploring John Mill's Harm Principle

Freedom is a necessary principle that humans must obey in order for mankind to function. Freedom, on the other hand, may be used to bring harmful results to those directly or indirectly involved. John S. Mills' s article "On Freedom" emphasizes individual freedom of manipulation and coexistence with society. Mills emphasizes the limits of individual freedoms through the famous "injury principle": "Power can legitimately be exercised against any member of a civilized community, and the sole purpose is It is to prevent harm to others.

John Stuart Mill explains the concept of freed in various ways. I will focus on his view on the principles of harm and want to talk a bit about his view on freedom of movement. The principle of harm and freedom of movement is two sub-themes of Mill's broad idea of ​​the concept of freedom. In addition to planning to discuss and explain these parts in the concept of freedom, I also plan to discuss my thoughts and emotions. - Ancient Roman poet Horace once said: "greedy people never get saturated." This sentence clearly depicts John Steinbeck's John Pearl theme and information. Pearl is a fable that tells moral lessons and expresses the subject that one may be greedy in materialism, which may lead to a decision of the destiny of a person or the destiny of others around him Hmm.

A famous statement of the principle of harm in the "introduction" to "freedom" of John Stuart Mill departed from the background and deprived Muller from a complex philosophical treatment - the basic reference and assistance of the British and US criminal law are criminal law The enforcement process, the law enforcement agency, and the theory of the 20th century will be formed. Moore's simple sentences, known as the principle of "hurting others", are the means of protecting individuals from moral law by the middle of the century by Hal, Feinberg, Wexler, and other freelance legal thinkers It appeared to the hand. The main principles of law enforcement are criminal offenses against homosexual acts, commercial sexual acts, illegal drugs and other acts that are later called "specific moral abuse" and other "no victims" "This chapter is important We will revert to discussions to clarify the differences and clarify the central point.

Many people tried to oppose this morality and paternal error by relying on John Stuart Mill's "Injury Principle" (Mill 1859: Chapter 1). However, in any interpretation, the principle of harm is too strict to contradict retaliatory justice, even if there is no other interest (such as prevention of harm), the principle of retaliatory justice is the principle of harm Varies. You should follow the desert (Tomlin 2014). A wider, more defensive liberalistic position is that the error related to punishment must be a citizen's correct concern (Duff 2001: § 4.3; Duff 2011).