Isaiah 58: 6-14 is a very powerful poetry. The first edition of the Bible I read was the James version. That version is meaningless for all reasons "you", "you" and "you". Then I reviewed it with the new Standard Edition. When I see it in the Bible it is more clear. There are some similarities and differences in the various versions I read. The most famous ones for me are the King James Edition and the new revised standard version.
I announced the detailed reading of Isaiah 6 before (see BI 6,58-86; reprinted by Landy, BEAUTY and ENIGMA). In this article I would like to develop my early insight / confusion about Isaia 6, by reviewing Isaia 6's audiovisual theory, especially the old comparison of Isaia 6 and 40. I think that Isaiah 40 is not directly related to Isaia 6, but most people think that this word is exaggerated. Instead, it's an incredibly persistent but fickle iteration. The voice hesitated, was interrupted by various indirect modes, and started again. As in Isaiah 6, in the rupture shown by death and exile, voice prophecy expresses helplessness. But what it calls pure visual clarity and express rhetoric is impressive. This may be only a reversal of the first part of the book (a position that gains strong critical support), or it may not be the case
The scholars believe that Isaiah contains the literary form of Exodus' s "prediction". For example, some parts of Isaiah 2: 2-4, 56: 1-8, and 58: 1-14 are the form of 'prediction law' reflecting the background of the corresponding Ezra and Nehemiah It is thought. . However, there are some problems and limitations in this proposition, and closely observing the interrelationship between Isaiah and other Hebrew Scriptures is contrary to Isaiah's author's assumption or Taura's perception. In this article, I will examine the hypothesis of formal criticism, and the form of the law and Schindz im Leben's prophecy, the author of Isaiah understands the law of theology in its different theological interests and interests Refer to the Book of the Law