Examining the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Argument for the Existence of God Based on Religious Experience

Religious experience is an event that causes God to encounter experience. This is communication between God and individual, bringing overwhelming understanding about God. As a result, experiences may experience transitions that may be thought of as having accepted a revelation, a sacred committee, or a feeling of fulfilling mental responsibility. But one of the possible questions is whether there is a strong reason to suggest that this experience prove the existence of God.

Discussion of religious experience is an argument from the experience of God to the existence of God. This argument asserts in a powerful way that only experiences of existence are possible and that phenomena of religious experience can prove the existence of God. Because people experience God, they must possess God; the case is closed. In a weaker form, this argument only claims that religious experience constitutes evidence of the existence of God. Richard Swinburn defends this form of argument and proposes credibility principles

The obvious fact about the existence of God is that some people claim to have experienced God. It is these religious experiences being used by philosophers to discuss the existence of God. - The following documents provide the rationale for the existence of God. By proving that the world of atheists can not explain the prerequisites of the laws of logic, atheists can not even explain reasonable arguments about the existence of God. "Opposed impossibility" is the only best proof that the requisite truth of the existence of God, that God's revelation to us allows us to use logic. This can be transformed into the following form using only the required truth. L: (logic law) G: (God exists) If L requires GL = G rule of reasoning "