Review of Bono leadership Since the establishment of the U2 band in 1976, their singer Paul Hewson (better known as Bono) has begun to play a role in the world. Bono first began playing band music with welfare concerts and gathered money for charity groups. Since then, he has expanded his prospects for world problems and greatly increased his charity and humanitarian activities. This article reflects the ability to withdraw Bono's obligations and AIDS assistance to low-developed countries, as well as an organization (debt AIDS trade Africa) that eliminates debt of $ 100 billion such as debt and debt.
Bono and Judge (2004) studied the role of personality in trading and the change in leadership. Their research is based on a meta-analysis of the relationship between personality and change rating, and transaction leadership behavior. Personality characteristics are related to the three dimensions of innovative leadership - the three dimensions of the impact of idealization - motivation motivation or charisma, intellectual stimulation, personalized consideration, and transaction leadership. Remuneration, managing abnormal active and passive leadership. Extroversion as a major personality trait is known to be the most consistent associativity of innovative leadership and even charisma is closely related to this style of leadership. Discovery that neurosis and responsibility are unrelated to transitive leadership behavior
In the past decade, the transformation method has been the subject of much research. Judge and Bono (2000) studied the relationship between transformational leadership and five personality factors. Leung and Bozionelos (2004) studied the relationship between transformational leadership and effective behavior. Bass (1998) compares the two types of transactions and innovative leadership behaviors, helps the trading leaders set strategy and goals, and helps the subordinates achieve standardization goals, while the level is higher and more effective (Bass, 1998)
Purvanova and Bono (2009) argues that transformational leadership is suitable for participatory and charismatic leadership. Emphasis is placed on employee involvement and cooperation. However, the style of trading leadership is based on the principle of exchange between leader and subordinate (follower). The difference between the two leadership styles is explained from a political point of view. The followers will be evaluated from the leader or will be paid or rewarded if they follow the leaders' instructions or instructions.