Evolving Prayer

A growing prayer begins on April 5, 2010, and my father thanks you every day. Please help me to be happy, satisfied with it, and be satisfied with all the days that you give me. Every person is a gift in your hand. Please help not to waste it. Please use my time wisely. "This is the day the Lord has done, I will be pleased and happy." (Lord) Pour out my heart, O LORD. "Looking for me with all my heart, you will find me and find me." Jeremiah 29: 13.

In the Hebrew Bible, prayers are an evolutionary way to talk to God in most cases through spontaneous, personal, unorganized forms of petition and / or gratitude. There is no standardized prayer like today, but since the beginning of Deuteronomy, the Bible has laid the foundation for systematic prayer, including guidance of basic rituals, and through the book after the Bible, Prayer has evolved into a more standardized form It is still fundamentally different from the form of modern Jews

In the 18th century, the 19th century and the early 20th century, public schools usually started a new day through verbal prayers and reading of the Bible. This situation began to change when the US Supreme Court in 1962 gave the first decision on public school prayers. Steven Engel, the founding member of the New York Citizenship Freedom Association, acted against his son 's school to force prayers for public schools established by the New York Council. Engel vs. Vital lawsuit ends legal sanctions against public school prayers

In recent years, the prohibition of prayers at public schools has spread to other fields. The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Richmond, Virginia, decided that the implementation of a committee held in North Carolina State and a Christian prayer meeting was unconstitutional. The US Circuit Court of Appeal decided that the Board's prayer is unconstitutional. Government-supported prayer opponents use the rule of law based on the interpretation of the Constitution to contain prayers in public institutions. In a society that respects and protects diversity, their arguments seem rational, even for many people with faith, when being advertised as a way to prevent a religion from giving priority over other religions.