Evolution of the Human Brain and Behaviour

In this course we will look for evidence of the cognitive aspects of the human brain, social intelligence, and evolution of cultural communication. Evaluating evidence from various fields such as archeology and anthropology as well as cognitive neuroscience and neuroanatomy, comparative developmental psychology, primate zoology, evolutionary biology, and how the human brain And I will study why. Niche adapting to cultural construction involves learning to use (and relying on) language, artifacts, and social norms. At the end of the course you are familiar with the pros and cons of the various forms of evidence that can be used to track the evolution of this unique human adaptation strategy.

Gowlett, J .; , Gamble, C.I. Dunbar, R. (2012). Human evolution and social brain archeology Current Anthropology 53: 693-722

Israel, K. And Van Shaik, C. (2009). Expensive brain: a framework to explain evolutionary changes in the size of the brain. Human evolution magazine 57, 392 - 400

Sherwood, C. C. , Suniaul, F .; & Zawidki, T .; W. (2008). Natural history of human thought: track evolutionary changes of brain and cognition. Journal of Anatomy 212, 426-454

Steele, J .; , Ferrari, P .; , & Fogassi, L. (Ed.) (2012) Special Issue "From Behavior to Language: Comparative Perspective on the Use of Primate Tools, Posture and Evolution of Human Language". fill. Cross R. Soc. B 367 (1585)

Whiten, A. , Hinde, R .; A. , Stringer, C.I. & Laland, K.N. (Ed.) (2011) Special issue on "Cultural Evolution". Philosophical trading of the Royal Society B 366 (1567)

In short, the social evolution of cetaceans and the evolution of the brain represent rare similarities between humans and other primates. I think that the evolution of the brain in these orders is mainly caused by the task of managing and coordinating the social world rich in information. These issues may increase as the scale of the group grows, but the size itself of the group itself is not an issue. Among primates and marine mammals, organized social organizations are associated with higher levels of cooperation and broader social behavior. Therefore, we suggest redefining the evolutionary pressure that leads to complications of brain and behavior to focus on coordination, collaboration, and challenges of "cultural" or action richness.

The enlargement of the brain during human evolution is dramatic. In the first 4 million years of human evolution, the size of the brain grew very slowly. The brain's redness to the size of the body or the evolution of the brain is particularly evident in the past 800,000 years and is consistent with the most unstable global climate. Larger brains allow humans to process and store information, plan and resolve abstract problems in advance. According to the fluctuation selection hypothesis, the brain that can provide a universal solution to new and diverse living tasks is beneficial for expanding the range of environments that humans face in time and space.

It is an abstraction. Brain organization and evolution begins to provide clues about how, why, and when certain major behaviors occur to humans. Since ancient humans comprised evidence of this behavior, they could be understood as part of a series of interrelated biological psychosocial events in a broader context of human evolution. In this way, the symbolic expression is linked in an intricate way to the evolutionary brain "expression" related to the need and dynamics of the human evolutionary niche.

In Part 1 we will explore the evolution of the human brain from a human ethical and ecological point of view As a preliminary evidence, in Part 2, the insight gained from this analysis is to understand the appearance of characterization It is important. Theoretical background of cognitive evolution Part 3 examines how the performance of the Paleolithic animal is explained by cognition and evolution of the brain. Essentially fantasy similarity is an evolutionary form of visual deception and has many forms such as moths that look like insects with bark and branches. These adaptive visual attributes serve as predators of "spoofing" and are the result of natural selection, not that prey does not deceive predator's "consciousness" efforts, and vice versa .