Evidence for Evolution

Evolution and diversity Charles Darwin (Rose, n.d.) Has laid the foundation for evolution. He proposed a hypothesis about natural selection, and it helped scientists develop this theory. Since evolution has been confirmed by massive scientific data, research and testing, evolution is a theory, not a hypothesis. The definition of the hypothesis is an educational interpretation that requires research and testing but has not been confirmed (Earman, 1984).

Many phrases, including requiring students to "critically analyze evolutionary evidence" and requiring to study "both strengths and weaknesses" in learning "evidence and evidence against evolution theory" It has been used to promote "evidence for evolution" approach. The theory of evolution theory, "behave as evolution theory" is not a fact. "The teacher also has room for controversy of the professor in discovering the" professional omnidirectional view on origins "and the institute's slogan. "Fuzzy professor controversy" is its power: media sources tell the public that evolution is socially controversial and that evolution also controversial among scientists. "Professor controversy" does not mean that the teacher asks the students to discuss scientific issues that are substantially controversial, but the teaching of the common ancestors (evolution) of the teachers is among the scientists It is a serious problem for the discussion of the teacher's advice.

I have decided to teach it as a reality, as I have no alternative but teaching controversy. Let us examine all the facts and evidence, let us let the evidence explain everything. In fact, this requires evolution of education in a more practical and practical way than generally taught. Gravity is around us and evolution is so. Why does your brain read the expression of your dog? Well, there are many things in the data. In 1776, Adam Smith wrote "the theory of wealth of the people" which is the founding text of capitalism. Charles Darwin announced "Origin of Species" in 1859. Like members of the tribe of Newton and Papua New Guinea, Adams Miss did not touch Charles Darwin's data. saw. Dawkins did not touch everything I saw. Dawkins does not know that the theory of evolution ultimately wins, if you really teach arguments about evolution theory. Why the question? Why are not you confident about the ability of scientists to speak?