Evidence Based Medicine (EBM)

The current situation of the nurse practitioner is that the degree of fear against the EBM is documented, the skills necessary to calculate the clinical outcome of the nurse practitioner unreliable or necessary EBM research, especially EBM 4 information It is not learned. It has been shown that the measurement nurse practitioner's educational skills are not beneficial for the ability to apply EBM and therefore due to this inherent educational weakness they are ultimately difficult to use and implement EBM is there.

Masic (2008) defines evidence-based medicine (EBM) as "to properly, clearly, wisely and rationally use the latest evidence when deciding on individual patient care" It is. EBM combines clinical experience and patient value with the best research information available. In a nutshell it is the holy grail of medicine - the way to support the best patient outcome. Unfortunately, EBM is an abandoned term, meaningless for clinicians, patients, and funding agencies. This process can be summarized in the following figure. There, the best available evidence is synthesized by the clinician, combined with clinical skills, knowledge and experience, and applied to the patient in an individualized and appropriate way. Sackett et al. Explain this as "combining the clinician's experience with the best available evidence."

Evidence-based medicine is completely dependent on having a solid evidence base (research). If the evidence base is tampered with and the price is paid, the EBM is not useful at all for science. As a matter of fact, an editor who has been involved with EBM for the entire career now feels it is not worth it. Does CEO of Phillip Morris (Marlboro Cigarette Manufacturer) smoke? This tells you all the information you need to know about health risks. Did the NEJM and Lancet editors believe again in EBM? It is totally different. So we should not. We can not believe evidence-based medicine until the evidence is removed from the corrupt effect of commercial interests.