Evaluation of Tennessee vs. Garner

Tennessee vs. Ghana On October 3, 1974, at 10:45 pm, Memphis police received a call on "extension call". Police officers Elton Hymon and Leslie Wright answered. When arriving at the scene, a woman standing on the pouch gestured to the house next to him, heard that the glass was broken, told that the next "them" or "someone" was broken. Light radio, Simon went back behind the house. Heard that the door crashed and saw someone running in the backyard.

In the groundbreaking decision of Tennessee and Ghana, the final court ruled when police officers were able to exercise deadly force. This became the law enforcement agency of our country, the error of respecting political consolidation became the national law enforcement agency. They make a subjective judgment of life and death based on human defects and prejudice. The judge submitted a license (racist) to the police. At the same time, they issued a legal warning to POC. Since there is no legal requirement of SCOTUS in the downgrade contract, it is correctly judged who is losing his life by fear of police and ability to read others. In a world that uses legally protected shooting methods for those who believe that racist police are "reliable threats" to their safety and security of others, sincere people often race I encourage POC not to cause discriminatory police. Note

The first sentence Tennessee v. Ghana (1985) set a legal precedent and police can avoid criminal proceedings if they claim that murder is a threat to the masses. In other words, it is permission to lynch. All the people concerned must do is that the victim is going to run away and commit a crime but to make a division decision for the benefit of the general public to kill the person. In this way, even if they shoot behind innocent disarmed people, officers can leave like a hero avoiding punishment

The responsibility of officials as individuals is an interesting topic and is regarded as justification for criminal responsibility. In the classroom, the textbook examined another case of Ghana VS. In Tennessee, and in this special case, officials acted under the regulations of Tennessee State and acted according to police policy when using fatal forces to prevent criminals from escaping. He was forced to escape or resist, or he could use all the means he needed to carry out the arrest. Although the policy of the station is somewhat limited compared to the above laws, it still allows for the exercise of deadly force in the case of robbery. This case was judged by Memphis Police Firearms Review Committee and submitted to the grand jury.