Evaluation of Hannibal as a General

Evaluation of Hannibal as a general when Hannibal left Italy in 203 BC "He filled Italy with his monumental battle monument" [1]. In this article, I will look at the Hannibal heritage and what aspects of his personality created these "monuments". After the research, [2] I listed several standards for the great generals. According to Lazenby, Hannibal needs "good strategic skills, tactical intelligence, and the power of a pure personality" to do what [3].

When Africans asked Hannibal to think about who is the greatest general, Hannibal made Alexander the second place, Hannibal picked Pils ... I asked Hannibal to think about 3rd place Do not hesitate to name yourself yourself. Then Sibbio laughed and said, "What would you do if you defeated me?" I was inspired by baseball saber measurements and I chose to use the replacement victory (WAR) system. WAR is often used as an estimate of how baseball players contribute to the team. It calculates the total victory that the player has increased (or decreased) compared to the player of the replenishment level. For example, a baseball player with five WARs brought five additional victories to his team, compared to the average contribution of senior minor league players. WAR is not perfect, but provides a way to compare players based on statistical data.

Finally, I will compare the evaluation of the highest rank officers in the history of Hannibal with my model. According to WAR, Hannibal underestimated the capabilities of all generals so far, Hannibal won the highest fighting strength in 519 (6th overall). Alexander the Great, appointed as Hannibal's supreme commander, was only behind the Hannibal and left a record of 391 WAR (10th in total). However, Alexander died after playing only nine games and won everyone. Hannibal cumulative battle number was 17 times, won 13 times, lost the second round, and painted. Total Value - Alexander shows his ability to win the battle and may keep winning if he does not die from sickness

My findings are quite different from those of Hannibal's epilus in Epirus, Greek general and Roman early rivals. My model uses only 3 races of Pyrrhus and -0.53 WAR. Hannibal attributed innovative military tactics to Pilfs but even before he thought that he was unable to prevent his army from causing deadly casualties during victory, I was skeptical about the tactical insight. The visualization of this project and its results is expected to provide an interesting and interesting way to explore and compare the relative success of the general. In the future research we can improve this model by extending the data set and considering other factors such as the strength of the opponent, but WAR is a Provide useful examples. If you are looking for a specific general, please use visualization. Please enter the URL "https://ethanarsht.github.io/military_rankings/***.html". Same in Wikipedia