Essay sample library > Euthanasia: A personal choice of inalienable rights

Euthanasia: A personal choice of inalienable rights

2023-05-19 09:43:48

Many people associate euthanasia with a very negative idea that the doctor will help the patient suicide. They do not understand that there are two types of euthanasia

The first type is passive voluntary euthanasia, and the second, more controversial type is called spontaneous voluntary euthanasia.

Passive voluntary euthanasia means that no measures have been taken to maintain human life, such as when the ventilator is removed or when nutrient tubes are not inserted. This is usually done when the patient experiences severe brain injury

They actually disappeared when it was found that a person had serious brain damage or even brain death. There is no reason to make them live artificially. This is very selfish and does not allow patients to endure pain and suffering. I try to "die" for everyone, but in tragic conditions, many people can not close

Then there is a very controversial positive and voluntary euthanasia. This is to accelerate the process of inevitable death with the help of the end-of-life support patient with the help of a doctor.

This approach is to discuss the right to human life and whether this right is proved by the right to end this life in a dignified manner.

Many people think that this is actually done to commit suicide. However, those who judge this behavior are not end-stage patients.

They will inevitably die only knowing that there is no hope for these people, the health continues to deteriorate, the quality of life continues to decline, and all the pain is experienced. With euthanasia, it allows them to skip the pain and die with dignity

This decision should not be made by sound legislators, nor should it understand the spirituality of those who are determined to be ill at the end.

This decision was personal, protected by individual privacy and survival rights, and died on its own terms.

Concern should be a living will. They legitimately state whether these conditions will occur when a person gets sick or when they suffer a brain injury

Through these, people should be able to explain that if they are eventually sick, they want to end their life peacefully.

By mentioning this before the disease appears, no one can say that the patient is losing his or her ability and not doing the correct way of thinking to make a decision.

Therefore, in order to better carry out this practice, we have to practice more widely to disseminate the understanding of the actual situation and the understanding of the usage of the will to live.

This option is indispensable for those who have never seen enduring endurance and want to avoid doing the same thing.

There is no problem with euthanasia. Whether it is natural death, artificial life, or the inevitable ultimate process, this is a personal choice to get the best quality of life.

Euthanasia should be legalized. People have the right to die with dignity according to their choice. People with terminal disease should have the right to choose to end pain and suffering. It is a mistake for the government to deprive him of the means of death for those who are ill at the end. It is wrong to force people to experience so much pain and suffering. Even if you legalize euthanasia, it will not lead to support of physicians who are not seriously ill. Accepting euthanasia reduces medical expenses and funds people who really benefit from medical care

So, is there a qualification for one to die? I feel that people have the right to make this choice. The word "euthanasia" comes from Greek-Eu. This means good and thanatos means death. Therefore, the meaning of euthanasia is its "good death". Euthanasia is a way to end people's lives, whether they are suffering or completely dependent on other people and machines. As the right to die should be legal, many suffering people can legitimately end their suffering. Euthanasia may be beneficial for all relevant staff and is the best choice for people with terminal disease. It alleviates the pain that people can not stand and provides a merciful and dignified ending to their lives. It also relieves the frightening emotional stress of family and relatives' friends. No one suggests to ignore the value of life. However, the only situation worse than the terminal patient who needs euthanasia is that the doctor refuses it and judges the patient's life and suffering!