The European Commission's proposal on software patents The European Commission maintains, clarifies restrictions on software patents, crackdowns large US corporations trying to monopolize software worldwide, avoids mistakes by the United States, Make a Mecca. We made great progress. This view can be supported by several ethical considerations including moral egoism, utilitarianism, and pluralism.
The European Commission, the founder of the EU proposal, monopolizes the initiative of the European Commission. It launched an EU proposal later adopted by the European Parliament and the Council. The European Commission can issue white papers or green papers before drafting proposals. This white paper is designed to guide readers through deepening understanding of problems, solving problems, or making decisions. In order to gather additional information, the committee can issue green paper to determine successful practices and policies. Public consultation not only provides direct possibilities to stakeholders, but also provides direct possibilities to advise the general public to the European Commission and the appropriate Directorate of the European Commission (DG) He drafted the proposal. One of the most relevant DGs for public health is the Health and Consumer Protection General Administration (DG SANCO).
The legislative process ended by refusing to recite the first Board of Directors. This may only be revitalized by new committee proposals. As of January 2015, this has only occurred once - Software patents directive in July 2005 (instructions on patentability of computer implemented invention). The majority of European parliament members (648-14 votes, 18 abstentions) refused the position of the bill. This case raises the question whether the committee can withdraw the proposal adopted for the first reading. Although the Committee reserves the right to withdraw the proposal at any stage, Congressional and the Council shall, after adopting the first reading-up procedure by the Council, notify the Committee's proposal that the text is the basis of the remaining procedures It is considered to form. Text of ownership
According to the joint decision, the European Commission, the European Union Council, the European Parliament can all play a role in the adoption of legislation. The committee proposed a legislation plan. Neither the European Parliament nor the European Union Council can pass legislation without the other's consent. There are Nabet and table tennis between the European Parliament and Parliament, and we are going to make a round trip and reach a mutually agreed version of the bill proposed by the Committee. Most EU decision-making (including the single market vicinity) uses this common decision-making approach, but there are many reasons for this decision-making approach, such as "consent" process to combat discriminatory measures and "consultation" process in the judicial and inter- Other legislative procedures are still used in several fields and police cooperation etc.)